You needn’t believe in magic to worry about witchcraft

You may have noticed the creeping increase in the presence of witches and witchcraft in popular and mainstream culture. There’s Harry Potter of course, and also the sinister Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, complete with devil worship, cannibalism, human sacrifice and, inevitably, feminism. Wicca, as modern witches tend to refer to their movement, saw its numbers in the US skyrocket from around 8,000 in 1990 to 342,000 in 2008. In the UK the 2011 census recorded (for the first time) the number of Wiccan or Witchcraft adherents as 13,042 (alongside 56,620 Pagans). It will be interesting to see what those figures look like in 2021.

The BBC, ever at the forefront of pushing transgressive agendas, ran a feature last week purporting to tell readers nine ‘extraordinary facts’ about British witchcraft – though I don’t think the (anonymous) writer understood history as he or she didn’t grasp that when Henry VIII banned witchcraft in 1542 it was because he had just taken over the powers of the church, not because witchcraft had been acceptable before.

The modern Wicca movement was started in 1954 by a retired British civil servant, Gerald Gardner, a man with a dubious interest in ritual nudity and scourging, and author Doreen Valiente. Gardner and Valiente’s writing, including Gardner’s spell book, the Book of Shadows, drew on ancient paganism and mingled it with modern ideas, many of their own invention. The pair set out a pagan system of nature religion centred on a male horned god and a female mother goddess, though many Wiccans are said to see these more as Jungian archetypes than literal deities.

The most characteristic feature of witchcraft of course is magic or sorcery, defined by adherents as seeking control over the secret forces of nature in order to bend the world to one’s will.

There are few hard statistics on the Wicca movement, but it seems clear that most practitioners are female and much of it is self-consciously feminist. It is very attractive to teenage girls in particular – a Christian-based spiritual helpline in California reported Wicca as the most common reason people contacted them, and almost all such callers were teenage girls. The appeal to this demographic is not difficult to guess: desire for control at a time of great change and uncertainty, and for belonging particularly to something that affirms the feminine. Interest has been spiking as the movement has continued to make inroads into popular culture and go mainstream.

Should we be worried? The answer must be yes – and that holds even if you believe (as most do) that witchcraft cannot possibly have any efficacy. Some argue that it is just innocent superstition, and even has benefits in promoting belonging and solidarity and providing a channel for teen angst. However, this overlooks that witchcraft has, unsurprisingly, a very dark side, and you don’t have to believe in magic to see how dark it is.

Magic, unlike traditional prayer, is not understood to be subject to the will of a good and all-powerful God to control what it is about. Instead, the spell is conceived as being entirely a projection of the will of the one casting it, and that will can be for good or for ill, to bless or to harm. Certainly, most modern witches claim to stick to the ‘white magic’ of healing and protection and steer clear of the ‘black magic’ of curses and hexes. Modern witchcraft even has an ethical code: the ‘Wiccan Rede’, which says ‘do no harm and do what you will’, along with the karma-like ‘Law of Threefold Return’, which posits a triple payback for anything done to others whether good or bad. Practitioners also generally claim to respect consent and thus eschew love spells.

But how widely observed is all this, rather than just being a front for PR purposes? The fact that ‘Rede’ means advice rather than rule should probably be a clue. We all got a taste of what I suspect is the true state of modern witchcraft in October when an occult bookshop in New York organised a heavily publicised hexing of Brett Kavanaugh. The organisers explained: ‘He will be the focal point, but by no means the only target, so bring your rage and all of the axes you’ve got to grind.’ The ingredients for the do-try-this-at-home version of the spell included graveyard dirt, coffin nails, a black candle, a broken mirror, and ‘revenge oil’. ‘Obtain a photo of your enemy,’ they instructed. ‘Mark it according to your purposes and write out your curses on it.’

This naked exercise in black magic didn’t appear to be in any way unfamiliar to the organisers, nor did they show any sign of being coy about it, as though it were something controversial in the Wicca community. Neither was there any outcry from among the supposedly all-white witches of modern Wicca protesting at the turning of their innocent art to malevolent ends. This is surely then the true face of modern witchcraft, the mask slipping when confronted with some great feminist bogeyman to bring down.

It doesn’t take any great insight to see that such a movement, dwelling on the dark, the morbid, the occult and the violent, cannot be healthy for young women or anyone to be drawn into. There is admittedly no research into the impact of involvement in witchcraft on a person’s mental health or life prospects, but it isn’t hard to see how a fixation on the dark and macabre side of things will breed negative attitudes and states of mind. Much of the movement is ultra-feminist and anti-Christian, replacing, for example, the traditional ‘till death do us part’ marriage vow with the much more modest ‘for as long as love lasts’ – hardly a recipe for fidelity or family stability.

This is not a complaint about using witchcraft and magic as a device in fiction and fantasy, where it can be very useful and entertaining. It is about the dangers of treating witchcraft as something real into which people, especially young girls, can be drawn by its glorification in entertainment and the media. We all as human beings need to help one another distinguish fantasy from reality, and point away from the dark towards the light.

First published on The Conservative Woman.

One thought on “You needn’t believe in magic to worry about witchcraft

Add yours

  1. Very interesting article and I agree almost 100% with it. There is only one thing I take an issue with:

    I myself am a christian (as you are), and whilst I understand the point of the article is to show that the rise in witchcraft in both Britain and the wider West is worrying whether or not one believes it has any power, I would submit that as Christians we oppose it precisely because it very well may have a form of power (scripture would seem to indicate that it does).

    Bear with me, I am not saying we are to look for supernatural events in everything (as some Christians are wont to do), but that doesn’t mean that we should deny supernatural things can occur (any rational and consistent belief in the Bible as the inspired Word of God cannot deny the supernatural). The reason witchcraft has been a taboo on these isles and was officially banned and punished is precisely because the previous christian civilisation saw it for what it was, an abomination against the only God. The only reason you and I find it difficult to believe that it can hold any sort of power (I myself am a sceptic and thus I am criticising myself here too) is because it has been gone from these shores for so long.

    Contrast this with Africa, where Christianity is continuing to take hold of societies which up until recently, held witchcraft in very high esteem. Whilst many Africans tend to see the supernatural in almost anything and everything (I as an African am saying this from experience) we as Europeans (I was raised in Europe) tend to ignore the possibility of anything being supernatural even as Christians.

    The point of this comment isn’t necessarily to say we should be more aware of the spiritual (which to me is the equivalent of being superstitious), I think that would be counter-intuitive and I could care less about whether witchcraft does indeed have any real power.

    Rather the point is that I feel that Christianity in Britain especially has allowed itself to become too secularised to the point that many true believers deny the very foundation of the faith; the inerrancy of the written Word, simply because the idea that God could use men to infallibly convey the truth of the Gospel to us is unpalatable to secular minds. As such we often find ourselves trying to win over the culture with secular arguments, rather than arguments based in scripture.

    Simultaneously we submit to people that Jesus’ really did rise from the dead. But we do not see the fact that if we give up on the inerrancy of scripture, we really have no way of knowing whether or not Jesus did in fact rise from the dead or whether there is a natural explanation (known or unknown) of the events which led to 1st century apostles to believe that He did.


Leave a Reply to Christian_Student Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Website Powered by

Up ↑